These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is routine cervical dilatation necessary during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial.
    Author: Güngördük K, Yildirim G, Ark C.
    Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jun; 49(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 19566557.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to determine the effect of routine cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section on maternal morbidity. METHODS: Participants with indication for elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A (n = 200) women with intraoperative cervical dilatation; group B (n = 200) women with no intraoperative cervical dilatation. RESULTS: No demographic differences were observed between groups. There was no significant difference between groups in infectious morbidity (P = 0.87) (relative risk (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-2.11), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39-7.14), febrile morbidity (P = 0.66) (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51-2.87), wound infection (P = 0.82) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.44-2.81), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39-7.14) or urinary tract infection (P = 1.00) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.28-3.50), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.2). However, group A had longer operative times compared with the group B (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section did not reduce blood loss and postoperative infectious morbidity. The routine digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section is not recommended.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]