These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.
    Author: Demiryürek EO, Külünk S, Saraç D, Yüksel G, Bulucu B.
    Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80. PubMed ID: 19615650.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a fiber post to dentin. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty extracted human maxillary incisor teeth were manually shaped with K-files using the step-back technique. ISO size 45 files were used as master apical files. Post spaces were prepared and then the root canals were subjected to one of the following 5 surface treatments: irrigation with 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); treatment with ethanol, ethyl acetate, and acetone-based cleansing agent (Sikko Tim); irrigation with 17% EDTA; etching with 37% orthophosphoric acid for 15 seconds; and etching with 10% citric acid for 15 seconds. Fiber posts were luted using self-etching/self-priming dual polymerized resin cement. From the coronal part of each root, 3 slides of 0.6-mm thickness were obtained. A push-out bond strength test was performed by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Dentin surfaces were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after different surface treatments. Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that canal surface treatment affected the bond strength (P < .001). The highest bond strength was obtained in the Sikko Tim group. The results also showed that surface treatment methods increased the bond strength to dentin when compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Sikko Tim group was the more effective surface treatment agent compared with EDTA, orthophosphoric acid, citric acid, and control groups; however, it could not remove the smear layer and sealer remnants effectively on radicular dentin surfaces. Removal of the smear layer and opening of dentinal tubules are not recommended when a self-etching/self-priming adhesive system is used.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]