These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation justified for patients with chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection?
    Author: Sun LZ, Qi RD, Chang Q, Zhu JM, Liu YM, Yu CT, Lv B, Zheng J, Tian LX, Lu JG.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Oct; 138(4):892-6. PubMed ID: 19660358.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection using total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation is controversial owing to the visceral arteries and intercostal arteries originating from the false lumen. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients (mean age, 45.67 +/- 10.18 years; range, 21-68 years) with chronic type A dissection underwent total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation between April 2003 and March 2007. Careful assessment of the visceral arteries and location of entry and re-entry was done before surgery. Postoperative patency of the visceral arteries and diameter of the aortic artery and the residual false lumen were evaluated by computed tomography. RESULTS: One (1.12%) hospital death and 2 (2.25%) late deaths occurred at a mean follow-up of 28.5 months (range, 8-52 months). Visceral malperfusion was not observed. Two patients had spinal cord injury and recovered during follow-up. One patient had a transient neurologic deficit and recovered completely before discharge. One patient underwent thoracoabdominal aortic replacement for aneurysmal dilatation of the residual descending aorta 3 months after the operation. Thrombus obliteration of the false lumen at the distal edge of the stented elephant trunk and at the diaphragmatic level was 94.2% (81/86) and 61.6% (53/86), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory results with low morbidity and mortality were obtained. No visceral malperfusion and a low risk of postoperative spinal cord injury favor this technique in patients with chronic type A dissection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]