These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Author: Yoon J, Amy G, Chung J, Sohn J, Yoon Y.
    Journal: Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331.
    Abstract:
    Rejection characteristics of chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate were examined for one reverse osmosis (RO, LFC-1), two nanofiltration (NF, ESNA, and MX07), and one ultrafiltration (UF and GM) membranes that are commercially available. A bench-scale cross-flow flat-sheet filtration system was employed to determine the toxic ion rejection and the membrane flux. Both model and natural waters were used to prepare chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate solutions (approximately 100microgL(-1) for each anion) in mixtures in the presence of other salts (KCl, K(2)SO(4), and CaCl(2)); and at varying pH conditions (4, 6, 8, and 10) and solution conductivities (30, 60, and 115mSm(-1)). The rejection of target ions by the membranes increases with increasing solution pH due to the increasingly negative membrane charge with synthetic model waters. Cr(VI), As(V), and ClO(4)(-) rejection follows the order LFC-1 (>90%) > MX07 (25-95%) congruent withESNA (30-90%)>GM (3-47%) at all pH conditions. In contrast, the rejection of target ions by the membranes decreases with increasing solution conductivity due to the decreasingly negative membrane charge. Cr(VI), As(V), and ClO(4)(-) rejection follows the order CaCl(2)<KCl congruent withK(2)SO(4) at constant pH and conductivity conditions for the NF and UF membranes tested. For natural waters the LFC-1 RO membrane with a small pore size (0.34nm) had a significantly greater rejection for those target anions (>90%) excluding NO(3)(-) (71-74%) than the ESNA NF membrane (11-56%) with a relatively large pore size (0.44nm), indicating that size exclusion is at least partially responsible for the rejection. The ratio of solute radius (r(i,s)) to effective membrane pore radius (r(p)) was employed to compare ion rejection. For all of the ions, the rejection is higher than 70% when the r(i,s)/r(p) ratio is greater than 0.4 for the LFC-1 membrane, while for di-valent ions (CrO(4)(2-), SO(4)(2-), and HAsSO(4)(2-)) the rejection (38-56%) is fairly proportional to the r(i,s)/r(p) ratio (0.32-0.62) for the ESNA membrane.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]