These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Recommended changes for T and N descriptors proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer - Lung Cancer Staging Project: a validation study from a single-centre experience.
    Author: Ruffini E, Filosso PL, Bruna MC, Coni F, Cristofori RC, Mossetti C, Solidoro P, Oliaro A.
    Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Dec; 36(6):1037-44. PubMed ID: 19692259.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recently recommended changes for T and N descriptors for the next TNM (Tumour, Node, Metastasis) edition. We re-classify our operated patients to evaluate the effectiveness of the IASLC suggestions. METHODS: IASLC proposals include: (1) a subdivision of T1 into T1a (< or =2 cm) and T1b (2-3 cm); (2) a subdivision of T2 into T2a (3-5 cm) and T2b (5-7 cm); (3) a re-assignment of T2 >7 cm to T3; (4) a re-assignment of intrapulmonary metastasis in the primary lobe (PM1) and in ipsilateral different lobes (PM2) from T4 to T3 and from M1 to T4, respectively; and (5) a classification of N descriptor by the number of involved lymph node zones into: N0; single-zone N1 (N1a); multiple-zone N1/single-zone N2 (N1b/N2a) and multiple-zone N2 (N2b). From 1994 to 2007, 1805 patients were operated on for non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model to assess the prognostic significance of the T and N descriptors. RESULTS: Stratification by T descriptor was: T1a (362 patients), T1b (286), T2a (536), T2b (154), T2 >7 cm (58), T3 (243), PM1 (50) and PM2 (36). Stratification by N descriptor was: N0 (1150 patients), N1a (289), N1b/N2a (200) and N2b (67). A significant survival difference was found between T1a and T1b (hazard ratio (HR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.90, p=0.006) but not between T2a and T2b (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.86-1.43, p=0.38). Tumours >7 cm and PM1 had a survival similar to other T3 tumours (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.97-1.14, p=0.2 and HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.81-1.21, p=0.94). An excellent patient stratification was provided with the proposed four-category nodal grouping, with significant survival differences between N0 and N1a (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.50-2.21, p=0.0000001), N1a and N1b/N2a (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-2.00, p=0.02) and between N1b/N2a and N2b (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.14-2.27, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms the IASLC recommendations to subdivide patients by tumour size at 2, 3 and 7 cm, to re-assign PM1 tumours to T3 and to group patients according to the number of involved lymph nodal zones are valid and provide excellent survival stratification.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]