These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?
    Author: Tozaki M, Fukuma E.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 19696300.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether proton ((1)H) MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging might be useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-voxel (1)H MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in 171 suspicious or highly suspicious lesions. Using the residual water signal as a reference (4.7 ppm), a choline peak at 3.22-3.23 ppm was defined as malignant. If a high-signal-intensity lesion was detected in high-b-value (b = 1,500 s/mm(2)) images, that lesion was defined as positive for malignancy. Among the patients with positive results on diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the mass or focus were calculated from two different gradient factors (b(1) = 500 s/mm(2) and b(2) = 1,500 s/mm(2)). RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of (1)H MRS were 44% (40/91) and 85% (68/80), respectively (p < 0.001). If (1)H MRS was applied for mass lesions larger than 15 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 82% (28/34) and 69% (11/16), respectively. Of the high-b-value images, 24 benign lesions and eight nonmass ductal carcinoma in situ were visually negative. With the use of a cutoff ADC value of 1.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a specificity of 67% (43/64) and sensitivity of 97% (61/63) was obtained on diffusion-weighted imaging. CONCLUSION: (1)H MRS was useful for characterizing breast lesions measuring 15 mm or larger, and diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for characterizing lesions of any size. However, these two techniques still have potential pitfalls in relation to the diagnosis of nonmass breast lesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]