These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of FISH, PCR, and immunohistochemistry in assessing EGFR status in lung adenocarcinoma and correlation with clinicopathologic features.
    Author: El-Zammar OA, Zhang S, Katzenstein AL.
    Journal: Diagn Mol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 18(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 19704257.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between mutation status, copy number, and protein expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung adenocarcinoma, and to correlate the genetic status and clinicopathologic features. Forty-nine adenocarcinomas were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for EGFR gene mutations, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for increased EGFR gene copy number, and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for EGFR protein expression. Terminal respiratory unit (TRU) morphology, tumor grade, mitotic count, and pleural and lymphovascular invasion were also examined. Five of 49 tumors (10%) had EGFR mutation by PCR. Eighteen (36%) had high EGFR gene copy number by FISH, all of which were polysomies without gene amplification. Fifteen (31%) had EGFR protein overexpression by IHC, 13 (87%) of which were also positive by FISH. Of the PCR-positive cases, 4/5 (80%) were positive by FISH and 3/5 (60%) were positive by IHC. TRU morphology was observed in all PCR-positive cases and in about 50% of FISH-positive and IHC-positive cases. Pleural invasion was significantly more common in IHC and FISH-positive cases, and lymphovascular invasion was more often present in FISH-positive cases. No statistically significant differences in mitotic count, age, sex, smoking status, degree of differentiation, or stage were seen. Our findings suggest that a staged approach, with FISH testing as the first step, followed by PCR for the FISH-negative cases would be most effective in the identification of patients with EGFR gene alterations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]