These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: What constitutes too long of a delay? Determining the cortisol awakening response (CAR) using self-report and PSG-assessed wake time.
    Author: Okun ML, Krafty RT, Buysse DJ, Monk TH, Reynolds CF, Begley A, Hall M.
    Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Apr; 35(3):460-8. PubMed ID: 19762158.
    Abstract:
    The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is a burst of cortisol in response to awakening from sleep that is superimposed on the circadian rhythm of cortisol. Determination of the CAR is contingent on the timing of sample collection: a delay between waking and collection of the first sample may affect the rise of the CAR, and could explain equivocal findings reported in the literature. We evaluated the impact of a delay between wake time and collection of waking cortisol samples on the CAR. Two methods were used to identify wake time: polysomnography (PSG) and self-report (S-R). Participants (total n=207, mean age 74.0+/-7.2 years) included bereaved older adults (n=35), caregivers (n=50), patients with insomnia and co-morbid medical disorders (n=68), and the healthy older adults (n=54). We used ANOVA to test if a delay >15 min affected the CAR. We also fitted cubic spline models to assess expected cortisol levels, the expected CAR, and the expected decrease in CAR. Wake times measured by PSG and S-R did not differ significantly. Large delays were observed (for both PSG and S-R) between wake time and collection of the waking cortisol sample (24.8+/-32.2 min for PSG and 28.3+/-49.2 min for S-R). Both statistical methods indicated that a delay >15 min between wake time and first cortisol sample collection significantly affected the CAR (p's<.005); later collection times were associated with smaller CAR values. Later collection times and reduced CAR values may affect the interpretation of clinical associations. Our data also show that S-R assessments of wake time perform equally well to PSG for evaluating adherence with CAR sampling procedures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]