These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Positional changes of temporomandibular joint disk and condyle with insertion of anterior repositioning splint].
    Author: Chen HM, Fu KY, Li YW, Zhang ZK.
    Journal: Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 27(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 19769261.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To measure the positional changes of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk and condyle with insertion of anterior repositioning splint (ARS) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for further understanding of the splint therapy mechanisms. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with temporomandibular joint clicks were included. 31 TMJs were diagnosed as anterior disk displacement with reduction (disk-displaced group), and the other 13 TMJs were normal (normal group). All joints were scanned oblique-sagittally by MRI before splint treatment in three positions including closed-mouth position of centric occlusion (the position before insertion of ARS), incisors' edge to edge position, and mandibular least forward protrusion position (the position after insertion of ARS). RESULTS: 1) Disk-condyle angle: In closed-mouth position, the average angle was 54.23 degrees in the disk-displaced group, while it was 9.80 degrees in the normal group; in incisors' edge to edge position and mandibular least forward protrusion position, the angle was reduced to normal in most of the disk-displaced cases. 2) Disk position: From closed-mouth position to incisors' edge to edge position or mandibular least forward protrusion position, the forward displaced disk moved backward significantly, while the disk with normal position did not change significantly in the three positions. 3) Condyle position: From closed-mouth position to incisors' edge to edge position or mandibular least forward protrusion position, the condyle moved forward and downward significantly both in the disk-displaced group and in the normal group. CONCLUSION: With insertion of the splint, the condyle moved anteriorly and inferiorly and the disk moved posteriorly, most of the anterior displaced disks could be reduced to normal positions in the joint fossa. The result indicated that the splint protruded condyle forward and prevented the backward reduced disk from displacing forward again during mouth closing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]