These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Poor sensitivity of field rapid HIV testing: implications for mother-to-child transmission programme.
    Author: Black V, von Mollendorf CE, Moyes JA, Scott LE, Puren A, Stevens WS.
    Journal: BJOG; 2009 Dec; 116(13):1805-8. PubMed ID: 19781042.
    Abstract:
    We validated rapid HIV tests among pregnant women in a clinical setting. Field testing was performed using First Response 1,2,3 or Standard Diagnostic and Pareekshak tests. Results were confirmed by third generation HIV ELISA. Discordant or negative, specimens were confirmed by RNA PCR and a fourth generation ELISA test. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.5% (CI: 85.8-98.2) and 100% for First Response; 87.5% (CI: 46.7-99.3) and 100% (CI: 87.7-100%) for Standard Diagnostic and 90.2% (CI: 81.2-95.4) and 100% (CI: 98-100%) for Pareekshak. These sensitivities were lower than laboratory validation which approached 100%. The low-field sensitivity results have implications for Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission services.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]