These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM ): implanted defibrillators in HCM]. Author: Maron BJ, Spirito P. Journal: Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 37(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 19791462. Abstract: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young people. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), has recently proved to be a safe and effective therapeutic intervention in patients with HCM, both for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden death. Based on recent substantial experience, the ICD intervenes appropriately to terminate ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), at a rate of 5.5%/year. ICD discharge rate is 4%/year in those patients implanted prophylactically due to one or more major risk markers, but often with considerable delays of up to 10 years before the device is required to intervene appropriately to terminate potentially letal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Primary prevention of VT/VF occurs with similar frequency in high-risk patients having either 1, 2 or > or =3 noninvasive risk markers, and about one-third of patients with appropriate device interventions had been implanted for only one risk factor. The ICD has proved reliable in HCM despite the extreme and complex phenotypes often present with massive degrees of left ventricular hypertrophy, microvascular ischemia, diastolic dysfunction, or dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Failure to convert life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias to normal rhythm is extraordinarily rare. In conclusion, in high-risk HCM patients, ICDs perform in a highly effective fashion, frequently preventing sudden death by aborting primary life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A single marker of high risk can be sufficient evidence to justify the recommendation for a prophylactic ICD in selected patients with HCM.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]