These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis.
    Author: de la Morena G, Saura D, Oliva MJ, Soria F, González J, García M, Moreno V, Bonaque JC, Valdés M.
    Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Jan; 11(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19805413.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: To determine the feasibility of real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis, to study its reliability, and to test the concordance of this new method when compared with transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography (2D-TTE) as the diagnostic standard. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe aortic valve stenosis were assessed by means of 2D-TTE and 3D-TOE by independent blinded observers. Aortic valve planimetry was possible in 94.9% of patients. Inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.892 (CI 95% 0.818-0.936; P < 0.001), and 0.871 (CI 95% 0.780-0.925; P < 0.001) for 2D-TTE and 3D-TOE, respectively. Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference in aortic valve area (AVA) of 0.040 cm(2), with 2D-TTE yielding larger values than 3D-TOE. ICC of both methods was 0.724 (CI 95% 0.530-0.839; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Assessment of AVA by means of 3D-TOE is feasible in most patients with aortic valve stenosis. Reliability of the measurement is good. However, there is some disagreement with standard 2D-TTE that needs further investigation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]