These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
    Author: Nazeri A, Massumi A, Rasekh A, Saeed M, Frank C, Razavi M.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19821931.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: It is not known whether patients with normal baseline left ventricular (LV) function who develop right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardiomyopathy as a result of dual-chamber pacing can benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We retrospectively assessed the effect of a CRT upgrade on RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of patients who received a CRT device for RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. We assessed the effects of CRT on LV function, recovery, and other response parameters. From September 2005 through February 2009, 21 patients (13 men; aged 63 + or - 9 years) underwent a treatment upgrade to a CRT system. Before the dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 53 + or - 2.3%. After pacing, the LVEF was 31.2 + or - 3.8%, the LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) was 5.8 + or - 0.5 cm, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were 426 + or - 149 pg/mL. The duration of pacing before documentation of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy was 3.8 + or - 1.5 months. All the patients had been on a stable medical regimen for at least 2 months. After the upgrade to CRT, the follow-up time was 4.9 + or - 0.9 months. Sixteen patients (76%) reported a significant improvement in their symptoms. After the CRT upgrade, the LVEF increased to 37.4 + or - 9.0% (P < 0.01 vs pre-CRT). The LVEDD decreased to 5.0 + or - 1.0 cm (P = 0.03 vs pre-CRT), and BNP levels decreased to 139 + or - 92 pg/mL (P = 0.08 vs pre-CRT). CONCLUSION: A CRT upgrade is an effective treatment for RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and should be implemented as soon as the diagnosis is established. Unfortunately, about 24% of our patients did not respond to the upgrade.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]