These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Outcome of sigmoid compared to ileal orthotopic bladder substitution in terms of micturition and defecation parameters in an 8-year long-term follow-up.
    Author: Honeck P, Bolenz C, Wendt-Nordahl G, Alken P, Michel MS.
    Journal: Urol Int; 2009; 83(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 19829024.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Various techniques have been described for orthotopic bladder substitution. Bladder substitution with sigma is rather classed as a useful alternative standby. We report the long-term results of sigmoid neobladder in comparison to ileal neobladder with respect to urodynamic and defecation parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We matched 10 patients with sigmoid neobladder (mean age 62.6 +/- 10.9) and 10 patients with ileal neobladder (mean age 66.4 +/- 10.2). Mean follow-up for sigmoid neobladder was 8.1 +/- 2.1 years and 7.2 +/- 1.9 years for the ileal neobladder. Each patient was evaluated by medical history, the SF-36 questionnaire, physical examination and urodynamics. RESULTS: Bladder capacity differed significantly between both groups (sigmoid neobladder 619 ml, ileal neobladder 422 ml). Pressure showed a slight statistical difference (sigmoid neobladder 15 +/- 3 cm H(2)O, ileal neobladder 18 +/- 4 cm H(2)O). The defecation frequency varied significantly between the two groups (sigmoid neobladder 1.1/day, ileal neobladder 3.1/day, p < 0.0001). The SF-36 questionnaire showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Orthotopic bladder substitution with sigmoid segments has shown equivalent results compared to orthotopic ileal bladder substitution. The sigmoid neobladder is a useful alternative to the ileal neobladder.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]