These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Modified radical hysterectomy versus extrafascial hysterectomy in the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: results from the ILIADE randomized study.
    Author: Signorelli M, Lissoni AA, Cormio G, Katsaros D, Pellegrino A, Selvaggi L, Ghezzi F, Scambia G, Zola P, Grassi R, Milani R, Giannice R, Caspani G, Mangioni C, Floriani I, Rulli E, Fossati R.
    Journal: Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):3431-41. PubMed ID: 19834767.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Five percent to 20% of stage I endometrial cancer patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy develop vaginal and pelvic recurrences. Adjuvant radiotherapy can improve locoregional control but not survival. This randomized trial aimed to determine whether a modified radical (Piver-Rutledge class II) hysterectomy can improve survival and locoregional control compared to the standard extrafascial (Piver-Rutledge class I) hysterectomy. METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 520) with stage I endometrial cancer were randomized to class I or class II hysterectomy. Primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: The median length of parametria and vagina removed were 15 and 5 vs. 20 mm and 15 mm for class I and class II hysterectomy, respectively (P > 0.001). Operating time and blood loss were statistically significantly higher for class II hysterectomy. At a median follow-up of 70 months, 51 patients had died. Five-year disease-free and overall survival were similar between arms (87.7 and 88.9% in the class I arm and 89.7 and 92.2% in the class II arm, respectively). The unadjusted hazard ratios for recurrence was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.51, P = 0.72), and the hazard ratio for death was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.33, P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Class II hysterectomy did not improve locoregional control and survival compared to class I hysterectomy, but when an adequate vaginal cuff transection is not feasible with class I hysterectomy, a modified radical hysterectomy allows to obtain an optimal vaginal and pelvic control of disease with a minimal increase in surgical morbidity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]