These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A single-dose, three-period, six-sequence crossover study comparing the bioavailability of solution, suspension, and enteric-coated tablets of magnesium valproate in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions. Author: Marcelín-Jiménez G, Angeles-Moreno AP, Contreras-Zavala L, Morales-Martínez M, Rivera-Espinosa L. Journal: Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):2002-11. PubMed ID: 19843490. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Valproic acid has been associated with a highly variable intersubject absorptive phase; therefore, magnesium salt (magnesium valproate [MgV]) was developed to diminish variation during enteric absorption. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of MgV 500-mg solution, suspension, and enteric-coated tablets in a healthy Mexican population, and to compare formulation-related differences. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-dose, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study in healthy Mexican volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. In each period, subjects received single oral doses of 500-mg MgV solution, suspension, and enteric-coated tablet formulations, with a 7-day washout period between each dosing period. Serial blood samples were collected at 0 hour (prior to MgV administration) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after dosing. Valproate was measured by a new method of ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters of interest were C(max), T(max), AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), V(d)/F, CL/F, and mean residence time (MRT). Formulation-related differences were assayed in accordance with the Mexican regulatory bioequivalence criteria. Log-transformed values of C(max) and AUC were used to construct a classic 90% CI. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% CI for the mean test:reference ratio of log-transformed C(max) and AUC were within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed based on subject interview, vital sign monitoring, and clinical assessment. RESULTS: A total of 24 healthy volunteers (12 women and 12 men; mean [SD] age, 28.79 [6.5] years; height, 164 [9.8] cm; weight, 65.42 [8.95] kg; and body mass index, 24.28 [2.11] kg/m(2)) were included. For the MgV solution, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of C(max), T(max), AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), V(d)/F, CL/F, and MRT were 59.75 (8.24) microg/mL, 0.542 (0.14) hours, 1099.67 (241.70) microg h/mL, 1156.30 (264.01) microg h/mL, 16.19 (2.36) hours, 9633.68 (1892.70) mL, 418.35 (92.01) mL/h, and 18.36 (1.44) hours, respectively. For the MgV suspension, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of C(max), T(max), AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), V(d)/F, CL/F, and MRT were 55.04 (7.72) microg/mL, 0.773 (0.51) hour, 1057.76 (223.37) microg h/mL, 1111.09 (245.07) microg h/mL, 16.32 (2.20) hours, 1069.05 (1775.64) mL, 435.43 (99.59) mL/h, and 18.41 (1.43) hours, respectively. For the MgV enteric-coated tablets, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of C(max), T(max), AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), V(d)/F, CL/F, and MRT were 54.88 (6.73) microg/mL, 2.79 (0.89) hours, 1100.79 (216.70) microg h/mL, 1163.61 (238.36) microg h/mL, 16.48 (2.10) hours, 9675.15 (1659.36) mL, 412.36 (85.24) mL/h, and 19.95 (1.53) hours, respectively. The 90% CIs for the tablets:solution ratio were 82.15 to 95.44, 94.60 to 105.39, and 95.43 to 105.95 for C(max), AUC(0-72), and AUC(0-infinity), respectively. The 90% CIs for the suspension:solution ratio were 84.79 to 98.50, 88.89 to 99.02, and 89.15 to 98.97, respectively. The 90% CIs for the tablets:suspension ratio were 89.90 to 104.43, 100.84 to 112.34, and 101.60 to 112.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: This single-dose study found that the 3 formulations (solution, suspension, and enteric-coated tablets) of MgV met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these healthy, fasting, Mexican volunteers.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]