These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Performance of radiologists in detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network.
    Author: Oda S, Awai K, Suzuki K, Yanaga Y, Funama Y, MacMahon H, Yamashita Y.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W397-402. PubMed ID: 19843717.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: A massive-training artificial neural network is a nonlinear pattern recognition tool used to suppress rib opacity on chest radiographs while soft-tissue contrast is maintained. We investigated the effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network on the performance of radiologists in the detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 60 chest radiographs; 30 depicted solitary pulmonary nodules, and 30 showed no nodules. A stratified random-sampling scheme was used to select the images from the standard digital image database developed by the Japanese Society of Radiologic Technology. The mean diameter of the 30 pulmonary nodules was 14.7 +/- 4.1 (SD) mm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules first on the chest radiographs without and then on the radiographs with rib suppression. Seven board-certified radiologists and five radiology residents participated in this observer study. RESULTS: For all 12 observers, the mean values of the area under the best-fit receiver operating characteristic curve for images without and with rib suppression were 0.816 +/- 0.077 and 0.843 +/- 0.074; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). The mean areas under the curve for images without and with rib suppression were 0.848 +/- 0.059 and 0.883 +/- 0.050 for the seven board-certified radiologists (p = 0.011) and 0.770 +/- 0.081 and 0.788 +/- 0.074 for the five radiology residents (p = 0.310). CONCLUSION: In the detection of pulmonary nodules, evaluation of a combination of rib-suppressed and original chest radiographs significantly improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists over the use of chest radiographs alone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]