These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Are harassment victims a special group of patients in psychosomatic rehabilitation?].
    Author: Kobelt A, Pfeiffer W, Winkler M, vom Bauer V, Gutenbrunner Ch, Petermann F.
    Journal: Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2009 Oct; 48(5):312-20. PubMed ID: 19847728.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Between 50 and 90% of patients in psychosomatic rehabilitation are affected by occupational problems and misdirected stress. The patients often find themselves in a vicious circle in which occupational problems lead to the development of mental illnesses before a background of lacking compensation possibilities and positive resources. Besides, mobbing can be understood as a special form of occupational stress, whereas in former studies, no differences in the magnitude of mental strain were discovered in comparison with rehabilitants who were in a psychosomatic remedial treatment. PURPOSE: Patients who are in psychosomatic remedial treatment and are norm-aberrantly limited in their occupational efficiency and patients who are affected by mobbing in the job show a higher psychosocial strain than other patients in treatment whose occupational efficiency is not limited. Do mobbing victims more frequently receive a recommendation that measures to strengthen their working life participation be considered? METHOD: A total of 189 patients were handed out a questionnaire at the beginning of their remedial treatment comprised of questions regarding their mobbing experiences, the IRES-3, the SCL-27, the Fatigue-Scale, the Incongruity questionnaire and the VDS-scale. The sample was split up into a group whose occupational efficiency was limited, a group affected by mobbing, and a group who had no efficiency limitations. RESULTS: 72.6% were clearly limited in their occupational efficiency. 27.4% felt neither affected in their occupational efficiency nor due to mobbing. 21% of the sample as a whole were affected by mobbing. Patients limited in their occupational efficiency differed neither from patients whose efficiency was unlimited, nor from those who were affected by mobbing. On the other hand, mobbing victims differed in all symptom scales evaluated from patients who had no occupational efficiency limitations. Also the scales on personality styles were substantially increased compared to this group. With mobbing victims it was recommended more often that the possibilities for working life participation measures should be checked. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in psychosomatic rehabilitation are strongly affected by occupational limitations and have a huge need for counselling and support. Therapy concepts should pick up the occupational problems at hand in a differentiated manner, with job-oriented linked-up rehabilitation being recommended. The increased mental strain of mobbing victims must always be borne in mind.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]