These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A candidate gene analysis of methylphenidate response in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Author: McGough JJ, McCracken JT, Loo SK, Manganiello M, Leung MC, Tietjens JR, Trinh T, Baweja S, Suddath R, Smalley SL, Hellemann G, Sugar CA. Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2009 Dec; 48(12):1155-64. PubMed ID: 19858760. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study examines the potential role of candidate genes in moderating treatment effects of methylphenidate (MPH) in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Eighty-two subjects with ADHD aged 6 to 17 years participated in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, crossover titration trial of immediate release MPH three times daily. The subjects were assessed on a variety of parent and clinician ratings and a laboratory math test. Data reduction based on principal components analysis identified statistically derived efficacy and side effect outcomes. RESULTS: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom response was predicted by polymorphisms at the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) intron 2 VNTR (p = .01), with a suggested trend for catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) (p = .04). Gene × dose interactions were noted on math test outcomes for the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) promoter (p = .008), DRD4 exon 3 VNTR (p = .006), and SLC6A4 promoter insertion/deletion polymorphism (5HTTLPR) (p = .02). Irritability was predicted by COMT (p = .02). Vegetative symptoms were predicted by 5HTTLPR (p = .003). No significant effects were noted for the dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) or synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP25). CONCLUSIONS: This article confirms and expands previous studies suggesting that genes moderate ADHD treatment response. The ADHD outcomes are not unitary but reflect both behavioral and learning domains that are likely influenced by different genes. Future research should emphasize candidate gene and genome-wide association studies in larger samples, symptom reduction as well as side effects outcomes, and responses over full therapeutic dose ranges to assess differences in both gene and gene × dose interactive effects.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]