MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Body density estimates from upper-body skinfold thicknesses compared to air-displacement plethysmography.
Author: Shafer KJ, Siders WA, Johnson LK, Lukaski HC.
Journal: Clin Nutr; 2010 Apr; 29(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 19880224.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Determine the accuracy of body density (Db) estimated with upper-body skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements compared to air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) and ascertain whether body mass index (BMI) impacts the accuracy of SFT to assess Db. METHODS: We estimated Db with SFT and ADP in 131 healthy men and women with normal (N; 18.5-24.9kg/m(2)), overweight (OW; 25-29.9kg/m(2)), and obese (OB; 30-39.9kg/m(2)) BMI. RESULTS: Compared with ADP, SFT overestimated (p<0.05) Db in OW and OB females and in OB males (-0.0047, -0.0164 and -0.0119g/cc, respectively), and underestimated (p<0.05) Db in N females and males (0.0050 and 0.0068g/cc, respectively) but did not differently estimate Db in OW males. The gender by BMI group interaction was not significant. SFT underestimated (p<0.05; 0.0058g/cc) Db in the N and overestimated (p<0.05; 0.0113g/cc) Db in the OB BMI groups. The error in predicting Db did not change significantly over the range of Db within the N (r=0.239, p=0.06) and OB (r=0.160, p=0.934) BMI groups. Limits of agreement were -0.0165 to 0.0284g/cc and -0.0365 to 0.0085g/cc for the N and OB BMI groups, respectively. The error of estimating Db with SFT was correlated with mean Db in the aggregate sample (r=0.495, p<0.0001) and the OW group (r=0.394, p<0.009). The regression-based limits of agreement were +/-0.0226g/cc in the total group and +/-0.0168g/cc in the OW group. CONCLUSIONS: Although SFT offer practical advantages, the validity of SFT to estimate Db among individuals with N and OB BMI is adversely affected.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]