These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Serum cystatin C-based formulas for prediction of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    Author: Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L.
    Journal: Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 114(2):c118-26. PubMed ID: 19887832.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The present study, involving a large group of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), compares different serum cystatin C-based equations for prediction of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). METHODS: A total of 592 adult patients with CKD were enrolled in the study. Serum cystatin C was determined in each patient by an immunonephelometric method. Their GFR was estimated using 5 equations based on serum cystatin C: (1) the Larsson formula, (2) the Hoek formula, (3) the Grubb formula, (4) the simple cystatin C formula (GFR = 100/cystatin C) and (5) our own cystatin C formula (GFR = 90.63 x cystatin C(-1.192)). The actual GFR was measured using (51)CrEDTA clearance. RESULTS: The mean (51)CrEDTA clearance was 47 ml/min/1.73 m(2); the mean serum cystatin C concentration was 2.68 mg/l. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (cutoff for GFR: 60 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2)) showed no difference between the cystatin C formulas with regard to diagnostic accuracy. All equations underestimated the measured GFR except the simple cystatin C formula, which slightly overestimated the measured GFR. All equations lacked precision. The ability to correctly estimate the patient's GFR was high for all equations (87.3-91.9%), except for the Larsson formula, with which 29.2% of subjects were misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that all serum cystatin C-based equations, excluding the Larsson formula, are reliable markers of the GFR in patients with CKD, and for daily clinical practice the simplest formula (100/cystatin C) could be accurate enough for GFR estimation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]