These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of in vitro RBC labeling with the UltraTag RBC kit versus in vivo labeling.
    Author: Patrick ST, Glowniak JV, Turner FE, Robbins MS, Wolfangel RG.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 1991 Feb; 32(2):242-4. PubMed ID: 1992026.
    Abstract:
    This study compared cardiac-gated equilibrium blood-pool imaging studies using in vitro technetium-99m- (99mTc) labeled red blood cells (RBCs) prepared with the UltraTag RBC kit to in vivo labeling with stannous (pyro- and trimeta-) phosphates. The in vitro labeling procedure takes approximately 25 min and does not require centrifugation to separate free from bound 99mTc. Imaging studies were performed in 30 patients using the in vitro labeling procedure and in 30 patients with in vivo labeling. Regions of interest were placed over the center of the left ventricle, inferior and lateral to the left ventricle (background), and over the right midlung. The mean +/- s.e. in vitro RBC labeling efficiency was 98.5 +/- 0.2%. The heart-to-background ratios were significantly higher with in vitro labeling. The heart-to-background ratios, averaged among two blinded reviewers, were 4.6 and 3.4 for the in vitro and in vivo methods, respectively. The heart-to-lung ratio was generally higher with the in vitro procedure (3.6) than that observed with the in vivo method (3.2) but failed to attain statistical significance (p = 0.059). These results demonstrate the superiority of the in vitro labeling procedure over in vivo labeling for gated equilibrium blood-pool imaging.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]