These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Design and analysis of method equivalence studies.
    Author: Borman PJ, Chatfield MJ, Damjanov I, Jackson P.
    Journal: Anal Chem; 2009 Dec 15; 81(24):9849-57. PubMed ID: 19925005.
    Abstract:
    Method equivalence assessments should be considered when analytical methods are either modified or substituted. The TOST (two one sided tests) approach provides a sounder data driven method for testing equivalence than a simple comparative intermediate precision study which is typically performed as part of method validation. Prior to designing an equivalency study, an acceptance criterion (an acceptable bias between original and modified/changed method) must be chosen. The choice of acceptance criteria requires the identification of the smallest mean difference or bias between methods that is practically important. Equivalence testing in this manner is used to prove that the new method can generate data which continues to support previously established specifications. Once the acceptance criterion is decided, other aspects of the study can be designed following a set of design principles. When the design and acceptance criteria have been established, the collection of the data can commence. Demonstration of equivalence should not start until the validity of the observations has been confirmed such as assessment for outliers, normality, and comparison of variances. Once the suitability of the data is confirmed, the mean difference between the two data sets can be calculated along with a +/-90% confidence interval using the TOST approach. It can then be established whether equivalence of the two methods has been demonstrated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]