These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of positive pleural lavage cytology on survival in patients having lung resection for non-small-cell lung cancer: An international individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Author: Lim E, Clough R, Goldstraw P, Edmonds L, Aokage K, Yoshida J, Nagai K, Shintani Y, Ohta M, Okumura M, Iwasaki T, Yasumitsu T, Okada M, Mimura T, Tsubota N, Nakagawa T, Okumura N, Satoh Y, Okumura S, Nakagawa K, Higashiyama M, Kodama K, Riquet M, Vicidomini G, Santini M, Kotoulas C, Hsu JY, Chen CY, International Pleural Lavage Cytology Collaborators.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jun; 139(6):1441-6. PubMed ID: 19939412.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Pleural lavage cytology is the microscopic study of cells obtained from saline instilled into and retrieved from the chest during surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer. The aims of this study were to collate multi-institutional individual patient data for meta-analysis to determine independence as a prognostic marker and to characterize the impact of positive results on stage-adjusted survival. METHODS: We identified 31 publications from 22 centers/research groups that performed pleural lavage cytology during surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer and invited submission of individual patient data. Actuarial survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to ascertain the covariates associated with survival. RESULTS: By January 1, 2008, submissions were received internationally from 11 centers with individual data from 8763 patients. In total, 511 (5.8%) patients had a positive pleural lavage cytology result, and this was shown to be an independent predictor of adverse survival associated with a hazard ratio of 1.465 (1.290-1.665; P < .001) compared with a reference hazard ratio of 1 for a negative result. On statistical modeling, the best adjustment for patients with a positive pleural lavage cytology result was a single increase in the T category assigned to the case, up to a maximum of T4. Correction for differences in survival were obtained in stages IB (P = .315) and IIB (P = .453), with a degree of correction in stage IIIA (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Pleural lavage cytology should be considered in all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer suitable for resection. A positive result is an independent predictor of adverse survival, and the impact on survival suggests that it may be appropriate to upstage patients by 1 T category.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]