These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Square wave voltammetry versus electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a rapid detection technique at electrochemical immunosensors.
    Author: Liu X, Duckworth PA, Wong DK.
    Journal: Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb 15; 25(6):1467-73. PubMed ID: 19954961.
    Abstract:
    Square wave voltammetry (SWV) was compared to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in developing a label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the hormone estradiol. The immunosensor consists of a Au electrode anchored with a Au nanoparticle|thiolated Protein G-scaffold to facilitate immobilisation of an enhanced quantity of an almost uprightly aligned anti-estradiol capture antibody. Competitive immunoassays between an estradiol-bovine saline albumin complex and free estradiol in a sample were then promoted at the immunosensor. Next, SWV and EIS of [Fe(CN)(6)](3-/4-) were sequentially conducted at the immunosensor. SWV yielded familiar peak-shaped voltammograms with the peak currents readily employable in establishing calibration. A dynamic range up to approximately 1200 pg mL(-1) and a detection limit of 18 pg mL(-1) estradiol were achieved. In EIS, an electron transfer resistance estimated from the Nyquist plots was used in the calibration experiments. A comparable dynamic range up to approximately 1000 pg mL(-1) and a detection limit of 26 pg mL(-1) estradiol were obtained. However, a significantly 10 times longer analysis time and substantial effort were required to complete the EIS determinations relative to SWV. Moreover, a large amount of EIS data involving phase angle was collected but ignored because they would not contribute any useful information to quantitative determination. Overall, SWV was determined to be a more rapid, efficient, effective and low cost detection technique than EIS at label-free electrochemical immunosensors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]