These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up.
    Author: Kikuike K, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Shimizu K.
    Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 19956034.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of clinical outcomes of 1-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis (TSS). OBJECTIVE: To describe middle-term clinical outcomes of this procedure. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Little is known with regard to the clinical outcomes of 1-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for TSS. METHOD: Surgical intervention, perioperative complications, and clinical outcomes were reviewed in 17 TSS patients who underwent 1-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression and were followed-up for more than 3 years. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Japan Orthopaedic Association Score for back pain (JOA-B) and cervical myelopathy (JOA-C) and activity of daily life, before surgery, at 6 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patient satisfaction was determined at final follow-up. RESULTS: The JOA-B, JOA-C scores, and activities of daily life improved significantly 6 months after surgery, but ultimately deteriorated. At 6 months, the improvement ratios in JOA-B and JOA-C scores were positively correlated. Complications involving other parts of the body significantly influenced clinical deterioration. Twelve patients (71%) were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for TSS provided fair results, even for elderly patients. Although reasons other than spinal pathology affected symptom deterioration at final follow-up, most patients expressed satisfaction at middle-term follow-up periods.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]