These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Chronic kidney disease in Tasmania. Author: Jose MD, Otahal P, Kirkland G, Blizzard L. Journal: Nephrology (Carlton); 2009 Dec; 14(8):743-9. PubMed ID: 20025683. Abstract: AIM: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive disease which is becoming a major public health issue due to its high rate of premature death, poor quality of life and expensive end-stage treatment (dialysis or transplantation). The burden of this chronic condition in a community setting was examined. METHODS: Data were obtained from 369,098 Tasmanian adults (aged >or=18 years) and included 1,640,687 measurements of creatinine taken between 1995 and 2007. In 2007 alone, testing comprised 25.5% of the state's adult population. A modelled estimate of CKD prevalence was developed. RESULTS: For those at risk of CKD (aged >50 years), 50.6%, 70.2% and 82% had a measured creatinine (and reported estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) during the last 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. However, only 9.4% of people with eGFR of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) had albuminuria formally measured. Estimated prevalence of stage III or greater CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) was at least 11.4% of women and 8.6% of men during 2007. Detection of low eGFR increased significantly over the last 13 years. There was a large geographic variation throughout Tasmania and high relative mortality with lower eGFR. There is a broad gap between the number of people with eGFR of less than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (stage V CKD) and those receiving dialysis treatment. CONCLUSION: The number of people identified with low eGFR has increased significantly since 1995 with a large geographic variation. Despite this, testing for kidney disease (by measuring serum creatinine and albuminuria) in people at risk is still suboptimal.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]