These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of surgical ventricular reconstruction on diastolic function at midterm follow-up.
    Author: Di Donato M, Menicanti L, Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, de Vincentiis C, Salvia J, Yussuf T.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 140(2):285-291.e1. PubMed ID: 20038481.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available on the effects of surgical ventricular reconstruction on diastolic function. The aim of the present study was to evaluate changes in diastolic function induced by surgical ventricular reconstruction at 2 time intervals after surgery (discharge and follow-up) and to assess the impact of diastolic changes on clinical outcome. METHODS: A total of 129 patients (65 +/- 9 years, 14 women) underwent echocardiographic Doppler evaluation before surgical ventricular reconstruction, at discharge, and at follow-up (median 7 months). Patients with mitral regurgitation were excluded. Diastolic pattern was graded as follows: 0 (normal), 1 (abnormal relaxation), 2 (pseudo normalization), 3 (restrictive, reversible), and 4 (restrictive, irreversible). RESULTS: At follow-up, 28 (21.7%) of 129 patients showed a restrictive diastolic pattern (grade 3-4; group 1) and 101 did not (diastolic pattern grade 0-2; group 2). Preoperative and postoperative factors strongly associated with late diastolic restriction included sphericity index (higher in group 1), ventricular shape (nonaneurysmal shape more frequent in group 1), internal dimensions (greater in group 1), diastolic pattern (higher in group 1), ejection fraction (lower in group 1); left atrial dimensions (greater in group 1); mitral regurgitation rate (higher in group 1). At multivariate analysis the most powerful predictors of restriction were preoperative pseudonormalization of diastolic pattern (diastolic pattern 2) and septolateral dimensions (short axis). Overall, ejection fraction improved from 33% +/- 9% to 40% +/- 9% to 40% +/- 9%; P = .001; end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased (112 +/- 41 to 73 +/- 21 to 88 +/- 28 mL/m(2), respectively; P = .001; and 77 +/- 38 to 44 +/- 17 to 52 +/- 24 mL/m(2), respectively; P = .001); New York Heart Association class improved (2.4 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 0.6; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Mild preoperative diastolic dysfunction (pseudonormalized pattern) and increased septolateral dimensions are independent predictors of diastolic restriction after surgical ventricular reconstruction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]