These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: hsp65 PCR-restriction analysis (PRA) with capillary electrophoresis in comparison to three other methods for identification of Mycobacterium species.
    Author: Sajduda A, Martin A, Portaels F, Palomino JC.
    Journal: J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Feb; 80(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 20045714.
    Abstract:
    We developed a scheme for rapid identification of Mycobacterium species using an automated fluorescence capillary electrophoresis instrument. A 441-bp region of the hsp65 gene was examined using PCR-restriction analysis (PRA). The assay was initially evaluated on 38 reference strains. The observed sizes of restriction fragments were consistently smaller than the real sizes for each of the species as deduced from the sequence analysis (mean variance=7bp). Nevertheless, the obtained PRA patterns were highly reproducible and resulted in correct species identifications. A blind test was then successfully performed on 64 test isolates previously characterized by conventional biochemical methods, a commercial INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria assay and/or sequence determination of the 5' end of 16S rRNA gene. A total of 14 of 64 isolates were erroneously identified by conventional methods (78% accuracy). In contrast, PRA performed very well in comparison with the LiPA (89% concordance) and especially with DNA sequencing (93.3% of concordant results). Also, PRA identified seven isolates representing five previously unreported hsp65 alleles. We conclude that hsp65 PRA based on automated capillary electrophoresis is a rapid, simple and reliable method for identification of mycobacteria.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]