These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [The noninvasive diagnosis of coronary heart disease in women. The exercise ECG or ST-segment analysis in the long-term ECG?]. Author: Hoberg E, Kunze B, König J, Kabel Y, Kübler W. Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar 22; 116(12):441-6. PubMed ID: 2004585. Abstract: The diagnostic value of an exercise ECG in women with the clinical symptoms of stable angina is limited because of its low accuracy in demonstrating coronary heart disease. A study of ambulatory patients was undertaken, involving 143 men and 29 women (mean age 55 [37-70] years), to determine whether ST-segment analysis of the 24-hour ECG gives better results, the coronary arteriogram providing the standard of comparison. 24-hour monitoring and the exercise ECG gave similar diagnostic results (66% vs 67%) in the 143 men. But in the 29 women 24-hour monitoring was diagnostically superior to the exercise ECG (76% vs 45%; P less than 0.01), as a result of a significantly higher specificity (64% vs 29%; P less than 0.05) and a tendency towards higher sensitivity (87% vs 60%; P = 0.13). As expected, the accuracy of the exercise ECG was thus lower in women than in men (P less than 0.05). There were no significant gender-specific differences for accuracy of 24-hour monitoring (76% in women, 66% in men; P less than 0.15). These data indicate that in women ST-segment analysis of the 24-hour ECG is better than the exercise ECG for demonstrating coronary heart disease.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]