These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging.
    Author: Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, Lee DH, Moon SK, Kim KW, Han JK, Choi BI.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20057319.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristic enhancing features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and arterial-enhancing pseudolesion (AEP) on gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess its performance compared with that of multirow detector computed tomography (MDCT) for differentiating small HCC (< or =2 cm in diameter) from AEP in cirrhotic liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 69 patients with 97 small, arterial enhancing hepatic lesions (0.5-2 cm in diameter), ie, 44 HCCs and 53 AEPs, detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, were included in this study. HCCs were diagnosed either through histopathology confirmation (n = 16) or by a combination of liver computed tomography (CT), angiographic findings, lipiodol CT, and AFP levels (n = 28). AEPs were diagnosed either through histopathology confirmation (n = 2) or were based on the angiographic findings, liver CT, and follow-up imaging (n = 51). Two radiologists jointly analyzed the morphologic features and the enhancement characteristics on the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Of the 69 study patients, 42 patients with 60 arterial enhancing lesions underwent quadruple-phase CT in addition to their MRI examination within 4 weeks before or after the MRI, and 2 other radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis independently reviewed the MRI and CT images in random order, at an interval of 2 weeks. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics. The Kappa test was used to evaluate interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Among 44 HCCs, 42 (95.4%) demonstrated low signal intensity (SI) and only 2 showed iso- or high SI on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Alternatively, most AEPs showed iso SI on the hepatobiliary (n = 50, 94.3%) phase, and only 2 AEPs showed low SI. Compared with the diagnostic performance of the 2 imaging modalities, the mean areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curves on MR imaging were 0.975 for reviewer 1 and 0.966 for reviewer 2, whereas those of CT imaging were 0.892 for reviewer 1 and 0.888 for reviewer 2 (P = 0.069 and P = 0.106, respectively). The sensitivity for each reviewer with MR imaging (93.9% and 90.9%, respectively) was significantly higher than that with multiphasic CT (54.5%, in both) (P = 0.001 and 0.0018, respectively). CONCLUSION: HCCs and AEPs show different enhancing features on the delayed dynamic and hepatobiliary phases of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may, therefore, help to differentiate between HCC and AEP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]