These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Dynamic finite element analysis of the aortic root from MRI-derived parameters. Author: Conti CA, Votta E, Della Corte A, Del Viscovo L, Bancone C, Cotrufo M, Redaelli A. Journal: Med Eng Phys; 2010 Mar; 32(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 20060766. Abstract: An understanding of aortic root biomechanics is pivotal for the optimisation of surgical procedures aimed at restoring normal root function in pathological subjects. For this purpose, computational models can provide important information, as long as they realistically capture the main anatomical and functional features of the aortic root. Here we present a novel and realistic finite element (FE) model of the physiological aortic root, which simulates its function during the entire cardiac cycle. Its geometry is based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data obtained from 10 healthy subjects and accounts for the geometrical differences between the leaflet-sinus units. Morphological realism is combined with the modelling of the leaflets' non-linear and anisotropic mechanical response, in conjunction with dynamic boundary conditions. The results show that anatomical differences between leaflet-sinus units cause differences in stress and strain patterns. These are notably higher for the leaflets and smaller for the sinuses. For the maximum transvalvular pressure value, maximum principal stresses on the leaflets are equal to 759, 613 and 603 kPa on the non-coronary, right and left leaflet, respectively. For the maximum aortic pressure, average maximum principal stresses values are equal to 118, 112 and 111 kPa on the right, non-coronary and left sinus, respectively. Although liable of further improvements, the model seems to reliably reproduce the behaviour of the real aortic root: the model's leaflet stretches, leaflet coaptation lengths and commissure motions, as well as the timings of aortic leaflet closures and openings, all matched with the experimental findings reported in the literature.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]