These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Donor/recipient algorithm for management of the middle hepatic vein in right graft live donor liver transplantation.
    Author: Radtke A, Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos GC, Beckebaum S, Molmenti EP, Saner FH, Schroeder T, Nadalin S, Schenk A, Lang H, Malagó M, Broelsch CE.
    Journal: Am J Surg; 2010 May; 199(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 20074699.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to delineate an algorithm for donor and recipient criteria and middle hepatic vein (MHV) management in right-graft live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) on the basis of computerized 3-dimensional computed tomographic image analysis. METHODS: Data on 94 consecutive right-graft LDLTs were prospectively collected. Graft and remnant data for the first 23 cases were retrospectively evaluated by means of 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstructions, and on the basis of that preliminary series, a graft selection algorithm using 3 parameters-hepatic vein dominance classification, graft and remnant graft volume/body weight ratios, and congestion volumes-was created. It was subsequently applied to the next 71 right-graft LDLTs. RESULTS: Fifty-nine right grafts contained the MHV. Four of the 12 grafts with no MHVs required MHV reconstructions. In 18 cases, small liver grafts were used. The postoperative function of liver grafts and remnants with versus without MHVs was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm favored the inclusion of the MHV with the right grafts. It also allowed for the procurement of grafts that were potentially small for size without compromising donor or recipient safety.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]