These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with vulvar cancer.
    Author: Hefler-Frischmuth K, Seebacher V, Polterauer S, Tempfer C, Reinthaller A, Hefler L.
    Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Mar; 149(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 20080329.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic potential of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), known to reflect the degree of tumor-associated inflammation and cachexia, in patients with vulvar cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We included 93 consecutive patients with vulvar cancer into our study. As previously published, the pre-therapeutic mGPS was calculated as follows: patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminaemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a score of 2, patients with elevated CRP serum levels without hypoalbuminaemia were allocated a score of 1, patients with normal CRP serum levels with or without hypoalbuminaemia were allocated a score of 0. The mGPS was correlated with clinico-pathological parameters. The association between mGPS and prognosis was evaluated by univariate and multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS: Mean (SD) pretreatment CRP and albumin serum levels were 9.5 (9.6) mg/L and 41.4 (5.3) g/L, respectively. mGPS was associated with tumor stage (p=0.01), but not with lymph node involvement (p=0.4), histological grade (p=0.8), and patients' age (p=0.7). In univariate analyses, mGPS (p=0.006, p=0.001), tumor stage (p<0.001, p<0.001), lymph node involvement (p<0.001, p<0.001), and patients' age (p=0.04, p=0.007), but not histological grade (p=0.1, p=0.3) and year of surgery (1995-2001 vs. 2002-2008, p=0.7, p=0.3) were associated with disease-free and overall survival, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, tumor stage (p=0.01, p=0.02) and lymph node involvement (p<0.001, p=0.001), but not mGPS (p=0.7, p=0.8), patients' age (p=0.6, p=0.4), histological grade (p=0.2, p=0.1), and year of surgery (p=0.4, p=0.8) were associated with disease-free and overall survival, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being associated with prognosis in a univariate analysis, mGPS cannot be used as an independent inflammation-based predictor for survival in patients with vulvar cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]