These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T.
    Author: Kim SY, Byun JH, Lee SS, Park SH, Jang YJ, Lee MG.
    Journal: Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):469-78. PubMed ID: 20093518.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T for depicting biliary anatomy with intraoperative cholangiography as the reference standard and to compare the image quality for biliary tract visualization at these two field strengths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent, 52 living potential liver donors underwent MR cholangiography at both 1.5 and 3.0 T. The protocol included projectional single-section rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and respiratory-triggered three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted sequences. Two readers independently analyzed images, scoring the visualization of all first- and second-order biliary branches on a four-point scale and determining the number of visible third-order branches. RESULTS: MR cholangiography at 3.0 T correctly depicted biliary anatomy in 90.4% of subjects on combined analysis of both sequences by both readers, in 88.5% with projectional RARE images for both readers, and in 84.6% and 88.5% with 3D fast SE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively. MR cholangiography at 1.5 T showed 86.5% and 84.6% accuracy on combined analysis for readers 1 and 2, respectively; 78.8% and 75.0% accuracy on projectional RARE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively; and 84.6% and 86.5% accuracy with 3D fast SE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively. With the projectional RARE sequence, 3.0-T MR cholangiography demonstrated significantly higher mean visualization scores for second-order branches (reader 1: 2.29 vs 1.78, P = .01; reader 2: 2.52 vs 2.10, P < .01) and mean numbers of visible third-order branches (reader 1: 5.53 vs 4.21, P < .01; reader 2: 5.91 vs 3.74, P < .01) than did 1.5-T MR cholangiography. CONCLUSION: Compared with 1.5-T MR cholangiography, 3.0-T MR cholangiography did not significantly increase accuracy for identification of biliary anatomy. Projectional RARE images at 3.0 T enabled better visualization of second- and third-order branches than did those at 1.5 T.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]