These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Outcome of aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses in the elderly.
    Author: Suojaranta-Ylinen RT, Soisalon-Soininen S, Kaartinen M, Maasilta PK, Vainikka TL, Vento AE, Salminen US.
    Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Sep; 18(5):514-23. PubMed ID: 20099692.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Today, the elderly population continues to increase worldwide, and rates of aortic stenosis (AS) climb with age. Since aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the current treatment for elderly patients with symptomatic AS, the number of patients undergoing AVR is expected to grow. METHODS: Among patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 1992 and 1997, a cohort (n = 145) was followed after AVR with a bioprosthesis. The patients were allocated to three groups, based on their age at the time of surgery: > or = 80 years (n = 30), < 80 to > or = 70 years (n = 94), and < or = 70 years (n = 21). All data relating to preoperative risk factors were collected. A control examination, which included echocardiography, was performed at least five years after surgery, and the follow up was continued until July 2006. The number of deaths and causes of death, as well as valve-related complications, were noted. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rates were 3.3% in the oldest (> or = 80-year) group, 6.4% in the middle (< 80 to > or = 70-year) group, and zero in the youngest (< or = 70-year) group. The mean age at death was 88 and 81 years in the oldest and middle groups, respectively. In the oldest and youngest groups, there were no reoperations, but five valve-related reoperations were performed during follow up in the middle group. At the control visit, the left ventricular ejection fraction was > 60% in all groups. In the oldest and middle groups the aortic valve gradient was lower than the preoperative level, while the left ventricular diameters and wall dimensions were smaller (p < 0.05). Valve calcification was observed in one patient in the youngest group. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients who had undergone AVR with a bioprosthesis had a good outcome after more than 10 years of follow up, with an improved cardiac function being preserved for at least seven years after surgery. Despite a severely impaired preoperative aortic valve function, octogenarians especially had a good life expectancy, possibly due to their low comorbidity rates. Hence, AVR with a bioprosthesis proved to be an excellent treatment in this patient group.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]