These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Results of atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral surgery in patients with poor electro-anatomical substrate.
    Author: Onorati F, Rubino AS, Mariscalco G, Serraino F, Sala A, Renzulli A.
    Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Nov; 18(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 20099709.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Enlarged (> 50 mm) atria, longstanding (> 5 years) persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and age > 70 years are considered predictive of recurrent AF following surgical ablation. The electrophysiological and clinical outcome after AF-ablation was evaluated in high-risk patients undergoing concomitant procedures. METHODS: Between January 2005 and January 2009, a total of 45 patients who complied with the three major predictors of failure, but who had undergone AF ablation ('left + right bipolar radiofrequency Maze') during concomitant mitral surgery were followed up. Freedom from AF, atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial tachycardia (AT), without anti-arrhythmic therapy (discontinued at the sixth month) was the primary endpoint. Survival, freedom from AF/AFL/AT with anti-arrhythmic therapy, early events during post-ablation blanking period, freedom from congestive heart failure (CHF) and from re-hospitalization, and changes in NYHA functional class were registered. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 18 patients (40%) showed sinus rhythm (SR) at admission to the intensive care unit, while 16 (26%) showed junctional rhythm and five (11%) required definitive pacemaker. Eleven of the 40 patients (28%) were discharged without a pacemaker, and experienced early events during the post-ablation blanking period. After a mean of 21 +/- 14 months' follow up, the actuarial survival was 88 +/- 7%. The prevalence of SR at six, 12, and 18 months was 74%, 64%, and 64% respectively. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT was 54 +/- 10% without anti-arrhythmic medications, and 51 +/- 9% with such drugs. Freedom from CHF was 85 +/- 6%, and significantly better in SR patients (94 +/- 6%) than in AF patients (69 +/- 13%; p = 0.018). Freedom from rehospitalization was 75 +/- 8%, and better in SR patients (94 +/- 6%) than in AF patients (37 +/- 14%; p = 0.0001). Accordingly, when compared to AF patients, the NYHA class was significantly ameliorated in SR patients at both six months (1.4 +/- 0.6 versus 2.7 +/- 0.9) and at the final follow up control (1.2 +/- 0.5 versus 1.9 +/- 0.7; p < 0.0001). The E/A wave recovered in 22 (85%) of the SR patients. CONCLUSION: AF ablation during mitral valve surgery achieves good electrophysiological results, even in patients traditionally considered as poor candidates. SR recovery allows a higher freedom from CHF and rehospitalization, with a better functional recovery when compared to AF.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]