These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessment of left ventricular function in non-dilated and dilated hearts: comparison of contrast-enhanced 2-dimensional echocardiography with multi-detector row CT angiography.
    Author: Burianová L, Riedlbauchová L, Lefflerová K, Marek T, Lupínek P, Kautznerova D, Vedlich D, Lánska V, Kautzner J.
    Journal: Acta Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 64(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 20128156.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) and contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CEE) are being increasingly used for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. Excellent spatial and contrast resolution of MDCT allows this evaluation along with coronary angiography. CEE improves the accuracy of 2D echocardiography. Data on side-by-side comparison of both techniques for assessment of LV size and function in subjects with a non-dilated or dilated left ventricle are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our study population included 64 patients. Group I included 31 patients with an implanted pacemaker who had a non-dilated left ventricle with preserved systolic function. Group II comprised 33 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe systolic LV dysfunction. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV) and ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed using both CEE and short-axis MDCT. The results obtained by both techniques were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, intra- and interobserver reproducibility was assessed. Both CEE and MDCT measurements highly correlated (r = 0.61-0.94). However, CEE significantly underestimated LVEDV and LVESV, and this bias was higher with enlarged LV volumes. LVEF was overestimated by CEE in both groups with a higher bias in the group with preserved systolic function. Both intra- and interobserver reproducibility was significantly better for MDCT, the worst reproducibility was observed for CEE in group I. CONCLUSION: Despite a high correlation between MDCT and CEE measurements, CEE provides consistently lower volumes and higher LVEF. This suggests that both methods are not completely interchangeable. Reproducibility of CEE is inferior to reproducibility of MDCT, especially in non-dilated left ventricles with preserved function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]