These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic value of imaging in horner syndrome in adults.
    Author: Almog Y, Gepstein R, Kesler A.
    Journal: J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 30(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20182199.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The yield of imaging in Horner syndrome has been explored only in children. This study evaluates the yield of imaging in adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 52 patients with Horner syndrome examined in 2 neuro-ophthalmology hospital clinics. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the ability to determine the etiology at the time of the first neuro-ophthalmology consultation: group I, etiology of Horner syndrome known at the initial neuro-ophthalmologic examination; group II, etiology of Horner syndrome not known at the initial neuro-ophthalmologic examination, but sufficient information obtained to allow targeted imaging; and group III, etiology of Horner syndrome not known at the initial neuro-ophthalmologic examination, and sufficient information not obtained to allow targeted imaging. The yield of investigation and the frequency of the different etiologies were evaluated. RESULTS: In 32 (62%) patients, the etiology was already known at the initial neuro-ophthalmologic examination (group I). The most prevalent etiology was surgical trauma. In 11 (21%) patients, a targeted imaging workup was possible, revealing an etiology in 7 patients (group II). Carotid dissection and cavernous sinus mass were the most common etiologies. In 9 (17%) patients, a nontargeted imaging evaluation was necessary, revealing an etiology in only 1 patient, who had a previously undetected thyroid malignancy (group III). CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of Horner syndrome is usually known at the time of initial presentation to a neuro-ophthalmologist. When the etiology is not known and clinical information permits a targeted imaging evaluation, an etiology can usually be determined, most commonly a cervical carotid artery dissection or a cavernous sinus mass. When the etiology is not known and clinical information is insufficient to allow a targeted imaging evaluation, an etiology is rarely discovered. Even so, nontargeted imaging is warranted because life-threatening lesions, such as thyroid malignancies, may rarely be detected.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]