These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Specifics of individual risks in a group of women with genital neoplasms]. Author: Matei M, Negură L, Carasevici E, Azoicăi D. Journal: Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(4):1216-21. PubMed ID: 20191902. Abstract: UNLABELLED: Genital cancers represent an important issue regarding women health, as they produce a large number of cases, invalidities and deaths. AIM: The evaluation of individual risks for a group of women with genital neoplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a pilot case-control study to validate the questionnaire for the evaluation of risk factors in genital cancers, in a number of 40 female subjects (20 cases and 20 controls). We have realized the data processing using the SPSS 16 and EpiInfo 3.5.1. soft wares. RESULTS: For questionnaire validation we have evaluated the reproducibility, the validity, the acceptability and the practicability of the questionnaire. In order to establish the test reproducibility, we have calculated k factors for inter-investigator (k = 0.34) and intra-investigator (k = 0.72) variation. To evaluate the questionnaire validity we calculated the sensitivity (cases = 94%; controls = 97%), specificity (cases = 67%, controls = 75%), positive predictive value (cases = 94%; controls = 94%), negative predictive value (cases = 67%; controls = 86%). The risk factors most frequently identified were genital infectious in clinical records (75% comparing to 52.5% - p = 0.036), and also the presence of other pathological records in genital area (65% comparing to 22.5% - p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For an accurate identification of individual risk at women with genital cancers subsequently studies on greater number of subjects is necessary.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]