These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Author: Proctor LK, Rushworth V, Shah PS, Keunen J, Windrim R, Ryan G, Kingdom J.
    Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To review the performance of a variety of biometry formulae for estimated fetal weight (EFW) in the management of severely growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler at a single perinatal institution. METHODS: Forty-three pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: chromosomally/ structurally normal fetus; complete ultrasound biometry at < or = 7 days from delivery; EFW < 10(th) centile; absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical arteries; and delivery at < 32 + 6 weeks. EFW accuracy and precision were compared among nine formulae utilizing combinations of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-six (60.5%) fetuses showed asymmetric growth (HC/AC ratio > 95(th) centile). Analysis of the systematic and random errors associated with each formula showed that the birth weight of asymmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by the Hadlock equation that utilized BPD and AC measurements only. The birth weight of symmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by EFW derived from Hadlock equations that utilized > or = three biometry measurements, including FL. Incorporation of FL into Hadlock formulae led to significant underestimation of birth weight in the fetuses with asymmetric growth (mean percentage error +/- SD: EFW(FL-AC), -13.3 +/- 9.8%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), -10.8 +/- 9.8%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), -11.8 +/- 9.3%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), -11.7 +/- 9.5%; P < 0.001). The same equations were accurate in fetuses with symmetric growth (EFW(FL-AC), 3.1 +/- 10.0%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), 1.0 +/- 8.9%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), 0.3 +/- 8.7%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), 0.4 +/- 15.5%). Use of the best performing equation (Hadlock 3), which does not include FL, to estimate weight in asymmetrically-grown fetuses over 28 weeks' gestation, would have reduced the proportion of those with an underestimation of fetal weight of > 100 g from nine (50.0%) to three (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Biometry methods that exclude FL should be considered in asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]