These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of a field test to assess performance in elite cyclists.
    Author: Nimmerichter A, Williams C, Bachl N, Eston R.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 31(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20221996.
    Abstract:
    The study aimed to assess the reproducibility of power output during a 4 min (TT4) and a 20 min (TT20) time-trial and the relationship with performance markers obtained during a laboratory graded exercise test (GXT). Ventilatory and lactate thresholds during a GXT were measured in competitive male cyclists (n=15; (.)VO (2max) 67+/-5 ml x min (-1) x kg (-1); P (max) 440+/-38W). Two 4 min and 20 min time-trials were performed on flat roads. Power output was measured using a mobile power-meter (SRM). Strong intraclass-correlations for TT4 ( R=0.98; 95% CL: 0.92-0.99) and TT20 ( R=0.98; 95% CL: 0.95-0.99) were observed. TT4 showed a bias+/-random error of - 0.8+/-23W or - 0.2+/-5.5%. During TT20 the bias+/-random error was - 1.8+/-14W or 0.6+/-4.4%. Both time-trials were strongly correlated with performance measures from the GXT (p<0.001). Significant differences were observed between power output during TT4 and GXT measures (p<0.001). No significant differences were found between TT20 and power output at the second lactate-turn-point (LTP2) (p=0.98) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) (p=0.97). In conclusion, TT4 and TT20 mean power outputs are reliable predictors of aerobic endurance. TT20 was in agreement with power output at RCP and LTP2.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]