These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of methods for the prediction of phenytoin concentrations.
    Author: Vázquez Rodríguez A, Santos Buelga D, Alonso González AC, Garcćia Sánchez MJ, Domínguez-Gil Hurlé A.
    Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther; 1991 Feb; 16(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 2026669.
    Abstract:
    A comparison was made of different methods for the prediction of the serum concentrations of phenytoin (PHT) at steady-state with a view to determining which of them had the best predictive performance. The methods employed calculated the predicted concentrations based on a dose steady-state concentration pair. Two of the methods used involved solving the Michaelis-Menten equation, determination of a single parameter in each individual and maintaining the Km (Method A) or Vmax (Method B) values at a constant. Methods C and D were Bayesian techniques that used population parameters determined in a population studied by us (Method C) and parameters drawn from the literature (Method D). Calculation of bias and precision suggests that Method C is the most suitable of those studied, with a mean prediction error (ME) of 0.56 +/- 2.16 mg/litre, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.76 +/- 1.31 mg/litre and a root mean squared prediction error (RMSE) of 2.17 mg/litre. Method C was also the method that showed the lowest percentage of underestimation (5.26%) and overestimation (10.53%).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]