These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Radiofrequency ablation-assisted robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar vessel clamping versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.
    Author: Wu SD, Viprakasit DP, Cashy J, Smith ND, Perry KT, Nadler RB.
    Journal: J Endourol; 2010 Mar; 24(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 20334556.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) may allow for improved hemostasis without need for renal hilar vessel clamping and elimination of warm ischemia to the kidney. We compare outcomes in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation-assisted robotic clampless partial nephrectomy (RF-RCPN) and LPN. METHODS: Thirty-six patients and 42 patients underwent LPN and RF-RCPN, respectively. In the RF-RCPN group, the Habib 4x RFA device was used to coagulate a margin of normal parenchyma around the renal mass to allow excision of the mass within a bloodless plane. Unlike in the LPN group, renal hilar vascular occlusion was not performed in the RF-RCPN group. RESULTS: Tumors treated in the RF-RCPN group tended to be larger (2.8 vs. 2.0 cm) and more often endophytic (52.6% vs. 16.1%). Collecting system reconstruction occurred more often in the RF-RCPN group (78.6% vs. 30.6%). Operative duration was longer in the RF-RCPN group (373 vs. 250 minutes), but this included time for cystoscopy, ureteral stenting, and repositioning of the patient. Blood loss, transfusion rates, renal function, and complication rates did not differ between the two groups. No patients required renal hilar vessel clamping or nephrectomy to control bleeding in the RF-RCPN group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RFA-assistance during robotic partial nephrectomy allows excision of renal tumors without hilar vascular clamping, thus eliminating renal warm ischemia. Larger and more centrally located tumors were excised with RF-RCPN. No differences in blood loss, complication rate, postoperative bleeding, renal function, or recurrence rate were noted compared with LPN.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]