These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dosimetric evaluation of inspiration and expiration breath-hold for intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Author: Tahir BA, Bragg CM, Lawless SE, Hatton MQ, Ireland RH.
    Journal: Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr 21; 55(8):N191-9. PubMed ID: 20348604.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to compare target coverage and lung tissue sparing between inspiration and expiration breath-hold intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a prospective study, seven NSCLC patients gave written consent to undergo both moderate deep inspiration and end-expiration breath-hold computed tomography (CT), which were used to generate five-field IMRT plans. Dose was calculated with a scatter and an inhomogeneity correction algorithm. The percentage of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving 90% of the prescription dose (PTV(90)), the volume of total lung receiving >or=10 Gy (V(10)) and >or=20 Gy (V(20)) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were compared by the Student's paired t-test. Compared with the expiration plans, the mean +/- SD reductions for V(10), V(20) and MLD on the inspiration plans were 4.0 +/- 3.7% (p = 0.031), 2.5 +/- 2.3% (p = 0.028) and 1.1 +/- 0.7 Gy (p = 0.007), respectively. Conversely, a mean difference of 1.1 +/- 1.1% (p = 0.044) in PTV(90) was demonstrated in favour of expiration. When using IMRT, inspiration breath-hold can reduce the dose to normal lung tissue while expiration breath-hold can improve the target coverage. The improved lung sparing at inspiration may outweigh the modest improvements in target coverage at expiration.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]