These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Streptococcal pharyngitis: clinical suspicion versus diagnosis].
    Author: Morais S, Teles A, Ramalheira E, Roseta J.
    Journal: Acta Med Port; 2009; 22(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 20350461.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Pharyngitis is a very prevalent illness in the ambulatory care setting. Its diagnosis is a challenge, especially in the differentiation between the viric and streptococcal causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A formulary was made to register the clinical and laboratory data; a throat swab for culture was obtained from all the children who presented to the emergency department with sore throat and/or signs of pharyngitis/tonsillitis, for a period of three months (15th of April to 15th of July of 2006). The signs and symptoms, prescribed antibiotherapy and frequency of false diagnostics were evaluated and the clinical suspicion compared with the diagnosis by culture. RESULTS: 158 children were evaluated, with a median age of four years, with a male predominance (56%). The period that showed the greatest number of cases was the first fifteen days of May. Forty-three percent of the cultures were positive for Streptococcus pyogenes. The more frequent signs and symptoms in pharyngitis were pharyngeal erythema (98%), fever (86%) and sore throat (78%). A significative statistical difference was found for cough, scarlatiniform rash, tonsillar exudate, palatal petechiae and tonsillar swelling. Of the signs and symptoms studied, only three of them presented a positive predictive value superior to 50%: scarlatiniform rash (85%), palatal petechiae (63%) and cough (57%). The presence of tonsillar exudate had a positive predictive value for non-streptococcal pharyngitis of 70%. Fifty-three percent of the doctors considered streptococcal pharyngitis highly probable, and from this, 56% had a positive culture for Streptococcus. Those who considered a low probability, the culture was positive in 28%. There were 37% of false diagnosis. DISCUSSION: The distinction between streptococcal pharyngitis and non-streptococcal pharyngitis is not always correct when based on clinical characteristics. The use of diagnostic tests is important in order to avoid unnecessary antibiotherapy as well as to allow the correct use in the positive cases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]