These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The antiemetic efficacy of thiethylperazine and methylprednisolone versus thiethylperazine and placebo in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide). A randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.
    Author: Diaz-Rubio E, Martin M, Rosell R, Valerdi JJ, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Barriga JJ.
    Journal: Acta Oncol; 1991; 30(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 2036244.
    Abstract:
    Forty-six women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant FAC (fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) entered a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial in which thiethylperazine (T) (6.5 mg p.o every 8 h x 3 days) plus methylprednisolone (MP) (250 mg i.v. x 2 doses) was compared with thiethylperazine plus placebo. Forty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. T + MP was significantly better in reducing vomiting (p less than 0.01) and nausea (p less than 0.02). The complete protection rate against vomiting was 36% for T + MP compared to 18% for T + placebo, and the percentage of nausea grades 0 + 1 (none or slight) was 59% and 27% respectively. The patient preference after cross-over was strikingly in favor of T + MP (70% versus 13%) (p less than 0.001). The most important side-effects of T + MP were facial flushing (22%) and euphoria (27%). Other side-effects, such as dryness of the mouth and sedation, were common after both treatments. In conclusion, the study suggested that T + MP is superior to T alone in protecting from nausea and vomiting induced by FAC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]