These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Impact of untreated mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated aortic valve replacement on late adverse outcomes. Author: Takeda K, Matsumiya G, Sakaguchi T, Miyagawa S, Yamauchi T, Shudo Y, Izutani H, Sawa Y. Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 May; 37(5):1033-8. PubMed ID: 20362456. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The impact of untreated mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) on patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) is uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate its long-term effects on outcomes. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 193 consecutive patients undergoing isolated AVR between 1993 and 2007. The mean age of the study group was 64+/-12 years, 59% were male and the mean preoperative ejection fraction was 59+/-12%. The pathologic aetiology and degree of MR was determined on preoperative echocardiogram. Patients were stratified into preoperative no/trivial MR (group I; n=134) versus mild-to-moderate MR (group II; n=59). The aetiology of MR in group II was either organic (n=35, 60%) or functional (n=24, 41%). Survival and functional outcome were compared between the two groups and analyses for predictors of adverse events were performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2.6% (n=5). In group II, mean degree of MR significantly decreased from 2.1+/-0.3 to 1.6+/-0.8 during the late period (p=0.003). The improvement in MR grade was more obvious in patients with functional aetiology. Although the actuarial survival was not significantly different between groups, freedom from re-admission for heart failure at 10 years was significantly lower in group II than in group I (23% vs 83%; p=0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that independent predictors of heart failure were presence of mild-to-moderate MR (p=0.012, odds ratio (OR) 3.8) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.004, OR 0.95). CONCLUSION: Despite the significant reduction after isolated AVR, preoperative mild-to-moderate MR is an independent risk factor impacting long-term functional outcome. Our results suggested that the concomitant mitral valve surgery for mild-to-moderate MR is warranted, especially in patients with reduced left ventricular function.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]