These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Transition to low intensity case management in a VA Assertive Community Treatment model program.
    Author: Rosenheck RA, Neale MS, Mohamed S.
    Journal: Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2010; 33(4):288-96. PubMed ID: 20374987.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To study transition to lower intensity services in a national VA program modeled on Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). METHODS: This study uses national VA administrative data from VA's Mental Health Intensive Case Management (MHICM) program, to compare veteran characteristics, patterns of service use and early clinical changes among veterans who were formally transitioned to lower intensity treatment and veterans who were not. Bivariate comparisons and logistic regression analyses are used to identify factors associated with transition to low intensity treatment and to characterize post-transition service use. Descriptive information on the criteria for termination and subsequent service use are also presented. RESULTS: Among 2,137 veterans in the sample who enrolled in MHICM from FY 2002-2006 and who participated in at least one year of treatment, 196 (9.2%) were transitioned to lower intensity services. These veterans did not differ from others on baseline clinical characteristics but had a smaller number of program contacts during the first 6 months of participation, a higher quality of family relationships and overall quality of life after 6 months of treatment. Only 5.7% were reported to have needed to return to higher service intensity after the transition and they continued to have reduced levels of service use on several measures but no reduction in therapeutic alliance. CONCLUSION: The VA policy did not result in frequent transition to lower intensity services. Those who did transition had shown greater clinical improvement, used fewer services, had better family relationships, and rarely required a shift back to higher intensity services.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]