These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The effects of a nucleoside-sparing antiretroviral regimen on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted darunavir in HIV type-1-infected patients.
    Author: Garvey L, Latch N, Erlwein OW, Mackie NE, Walsh J, Scullard G, McClure MO, Dickinson L, Back D, Winston A.
    Journal: Antivir Ther; 2010; 15(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 20386076.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens might be an attractive therapeutic option for HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients; however, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are frequently unknown. METHODS: Fourteen HIV-1-infected patients (age 21-55 years, 64% male) on stable cART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/ml entered this Phase I pharmacokinetic study. In period 1, patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine/-darunavir/ritonavir (300/200/800/100 mg) all once daily. During period 2, raltegravir 400 mg twice daily was added to the regimen and in period 3 tenofovir/emtricitabine was discontinued. At steady state, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. Differences in the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 2 versus 1 and period 3 versus 1 were assessed for darunavir and ritonavir (period 3 versus 2 for raltegravir). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between period 2 versus period 1. During period 3, darunavir GMR (95% confidence interval) values for trough and maximum plasma concentration (C(trough) and C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) were 0.64 ng/ml (0.44-0.93), 1.05 ng/ml (0.90-1.24), 0.92 ng h/ml (0.78-1.08) and 0.69 h (0.46-1.05), respectively, when compared with period 1. No statistically significant changes were observed in ritonavir or raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters. Darunavir C(trough)<550 ng/ml (the minimum effective concentration for protease-resistant HIV viral isolates) was observed in four patients during period 3 only. No clinically significant safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir C(trough) is reduced by 36% when administered without tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients. This interaction might be of clinical significance in the management of individuals with protease-resistant HIV viral isolates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]